Linux and UNIX-like operating systems in general are regarded as being more secure for the common user, in contrast with operating systems that have "Windows" as part of their name. Why is that? When entering a dispute on the subject with a Windows user, the most common argument he tries to feed me is that Windows is more widespread, and therefore, more vulnerable. Apart from amusing myths like "Linux is only for servers" or "does it have a word processor?", the issue of Linux desktop security is still seriously misunderstood.
News stories are provided by third parties, used with permission,
and copyright of their various respective owners.
Answers 2000 Limited has not necessarily reviewed,
and does not necessarily endorse or
agree with any content of, or views expressed in, all such items.
Comments are posted by our users. Answers 2000 Limited has not
necessarily reviewed,
and does not necessarily endorse or
agree with any content of, or views expressed in, comments.
